March, 2017 | Signature Litigation

News

Partner Simon Bushell examines the recent announcement that a number of specialist civil courts in the High Court will become the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales in The Times Law Brief.

Simon’s article has been published in The Times Law Brief, 20 March 2017, and can be read here.

Commercial court needs more than rebranding

Complex commercial disputes are big business and the market among courts and tribunals around the world is fierce. Litigators in London have been concerned for some time that the English courts risk losing ground to their various global competitors.

The lord chief justice’s latest response, revealed last week, is to rebrand the specialist civil courts within the High Court, creating the umbrella of the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales. Lord Thomas said that “the judiciary is committed to maintaining Britain’s reputation as the best place in the world for court-based dispute resolution”.

It remains to be seen how successful this rebranding is.

October 2015 saw the birth of the financial list, the much-heralded specialist banking and financial markets dispute resolution forum at the Rolls Building in London. It has showcased judicial expertise in complex financial disputes, creating a specialist, focused environment in which sophisticated users can have confidence.

Does introducing a further concept embracing “business” and “property” potentially water down or blur the message sent when introducing the financial list?

At present, High Court judges are appointed into the specific divisions, and then in some cases to the various specialist courts. Historic barriers prevent judges from moving from one court to another where, in all the circumstances, that might make sense.

The new umbrella will seemingly flatten the structure. All of the specialist civil courts will be able to draw on the judicial resources available in the other specialist courts where that might be appropriate. This has potential to work especially well in relation to the overlap between chancery and the commercial court.

The second key aspect to the announced change relates to disputes outside the capital. The message is that the Business and Property Courts will cater to parties in the regions so they do not have to issue claims in the High Court in London to benefit from the specialist judges.

From June, those judges will travel as appropriate, or those from the quota of “business and property” judges in any particular district will sit in one of the specialist courts as appropriate.

This is likely to have two consequences. First, the district registries of the High Court will develop their own versions of the specialist courts presently seen as focused in London.

Second, specialist cases that are based in one of the other commercial centres in the UK do not need to travel to London unless it makes sense to do so. This will lead to a better distribution of resources around the UK’s business centres. There is a clear political driver here: decentralising the UK’s business focus and embracing the regions.

However, in furthering that objective we must be careful not to disrupt London’s pivotal position in serving the financial and other markets and the international business community, which are large-scale users of the English commercial law.
To that end, the Rolls Building is intended to take centre stage in projecting the UK’s Business and Property Courts to the rest of the world.

Commercial court needs more than rebranding – Partner Simon Bushell writes in The Times Law Brief

Mar 20, 2017

Signature Litigation Partners ranked in Chambers Global 2017

Signature Litigation Partners have been ranked in the Chambers and Partners 2017 Global Guide.

Mar 17, 2017

Partner Simon Bushell comments in Legal Business re Business and Property Courts

Partner Simon Bushell comments in Legal Business in relation to the judiciary’s announcement that a number of specialist civil courts in the High Court will become the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales from June 2017.

Mar 14, 2017

Litigation Funding article by Natalia Chumak and Nick Storrs published in Legal Insight

Partner Natalia Chumak and Associate Nick Storrs examine the Litigation Funding process in Russian legal publication Legal Insight.

Mar 13, 2017

Partner Josh Wong comments in CDR re ZTE record sanctions penalty

Partner Josh Wong comments in CDR in relation to US Department of Justice enforcement of sanctions on Chinese technology company ZTE Corporation, following guilty plea of criminal conduct in relation to the company’s violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Mar 13, 2017

Signature Litigation shortlisted in the Legal Business Awards 2017

Signature Litigation are delighted to have been shortlisted for this year’s Boutique Law Firm of the Year Award at the Legal Business Awards 2017.

Mar 03, 2017

All Services


Antitrust	Banking and Financial Markets Litigation	Contentious Trusts, Estates and Private Wealth Litigation
Energy and Infrastructure Disputes	Insurance and Reinsurance Litigation	Insolvency Litigation
Professional Negligence Litigation	CIS Disputes	Judicial Review and Regulatory Disputes
Toxic Tort Litigation	White Collar Crime and Regulatory Investigations

Key Services

All Services